Once I found myself thinking that modern tennis is constantly upgrading and consequently the standard tennis technique and tactics are changing too. “Thank you, Captain Obvios”, might be your immediate response as it’s natural for tennis to undergo some development. But as we spend hours and hours watching tennis matches, the changes of tennis tactics become less visible and everything seems usual and routine. And it all went right until we watched the records of legendary grand slam finals that took place 4 years ago. For one thing, the players are the same, but their playing style differs from that of today dramatically. What exactly has changed? The role of the backhand shots in closing out points. And these changes are rather significant.
No doubts, backhand is the hardest tennis element. If you remember, in our article on forehand and backhand peculiarities we’ve mentioned that tennis courts used to be much faster than their today’s analogues. Considering this fact, the reliable backhand wasn’t that important playing element. It was enough to have a booming serve and striking forehand to achieve good results. Nevertheless, it’s worth mentioning that the overwhelming majority of players have no 7 feet tall and perfect physical data to boast of. As a result, they have to find another means to compete in power and strength with hitters and servers. What did they find out? They gave greater stability, consistency and flexibility to their backhand... Their tactics at that point was very simple: put pressure on their rival’s left side with rare shots down the line and hitting a well-angled diagonal thus making your opponents commit mistakes on backhand. Keep in mind, that the representatives of serve-and-volley style devote much of their training to polishing up their service play and explosive forehand and neglecting left side strokes. I think that this tactics was originated when Sampras and Federer reigned in tour. It was meaningless to compete with them in serve and forehand, as the two managed to bring these elements to perfection.
Nadal’s left-handed forehand
In our view, this moment marked the start of the backhand evolution. It was widely acknowledged that if you want to be competitive and show top results you have to improve all other playing elements, not just serve and forehand shots, as top players have left almost no chances to excel them at these components. So serve-and-volley approach has become inefficient and something else was needed to succeed. And the only one tennis element which could be potentially improved was found. It was backhand. Frankly speaking, there is one more highly-competitive tool. Left-handed tennis. Leftie with a booming forehand equals to the progressive backhand. You see, Toni Nadal was right when he taught his nephew to grip the racquet in his left hand. This is how the genius Nadal appeared!
As a result, many juniors who were eager to fight for top rankings started working on their backhand technique, making it more flexible and consistent. Putting pressure on the powerful player’s backhand tended out to be beneficial as it gave them no time to use their key tool – forehand. Consequently, hitters had to take great risks to avoid cross-court backhand shots exchange. And they either started making too many mistakes or lost their court position and became vulnerable to the opponent’s counterattacks. This tactics efficiency brought about the second step of backhand evolution.
Backhand shots by Djokovic and Murray
Backhand has become one of the style making elements in modern tennis. Mark you, that all top 20 players, except Federer, Raonic and Isner, perform excellent backhand shots. When the players started spending most of their time in cross-court backhand exchange, the necessity to seize the initiative and start attacking arose. This is when the players began to practice the hardest tennis component – down-the-line backhand. Shots hit from the left side have become more variable as the players started to implement diagonal backhand shots and learnt to vary the length and the power of the performed shots. It is no longer possible to get easy points in forehand exchanges. Putting pressure by hitting backhand shots was also not enough as the number of players with top level backhand has increased, as well as the number of left-handed players. That’s why the quality of backhand had to be improved. At that point we got to know Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray, whose backhand is superior to their forehand. If you watch the matches with Murray and Djokovic it’s evident that these fellows rely more on their backhand technique which is flexible and consistent enough to allow them dictate their rules on court. And be sure that future lies with this kind of tennis.
Benoit Paire’s backhand
I’m more than confident that in the nearest future we’ll get to know a number of such players as Benoit Paire whose backhand technique excels the forehand. The more I watched the French male matches, the more I tried to understand why his opponents don’t serve him to forehand were the French is almost dead? The answer is simple. First of all, it’s very hard to hit down-the-line backhand, especially when all your shots from the left are pressed by constant booming shots from over the net. Secondly, the exchange of diagonal backhand shots is the most –practiced tennis stroke. Most players develop and execute their own samples of shots so that’s very hard to adapt to a new style later on. If you are used to execute backhand return of serve, which is a very sound solution, you’ll find it hard to change it in course of the match. As a result, the players instinctively attack their opponent’s left side thus letting him use his key element – backhand. This fact makes me believe that such players as Paire and alike with great backhand and poor forehand will be successful in men’s tour.
To conclude with, I’d point it again that today backhand is the most crucial and style making tennis element. It dictates the modern tendencies and one will do nothing on top without it. Learning it pays dividends. Raonic and Isner do their best to cast it away but as soon as they are to play backhand pros (be it Djokovic, Murray, Nishikori or Gasquet), that’s it. They have nothing to offer these guys from the baseline and have no means to climb up the rankings. Will backhand keep developing? I bet it! And in 2-3 years only 77-8 players with weak backhand will be left in top 100.
Relevant news:Australian Open preview and Prediction: Rafael Nadal v Novak Djokovic
Who to back at Wimbledon after Murray's withdrawal
Wimbledon QF Preview and Prediction: Roger Federer v Kevin Anderson.
ATP Barcelona Final Preview and Prediction: Rafael Nadal against Stefanos Tsitsipas.
Assessing Nadal vs The Field at the French Open
From the moment he appeared on courts, Kei Nishikori has always been one of 5 or 6 super talented promising players. Within the last 3-4 years Kei showed nothing special which reflected on his modest results: he sustained a good tennis level, won several ATP 250 titles, performed well on majors – but...
The more I watch the matches with the American players the stronger is my feeling that they all resemble one another. It all looks like a plant cranking out products of the same quality and with the same spoilage. And this trend holds true for the last 4-5 years...
Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray. Who will replace these guys in the near future. Today we chose tennis players who made the biggest step in his development this season. So Thiem Dominic, Batista-Agut and ...
Tournament yet folds up for us quite well in the market of flat bets and live bets. 6 won bets in a row perfectly enhances the mood, but we are not going to lose concentrtion and relax ...
Everything in this match counts in favor of the Spaniard. Nadal, as a real locomotive, took long to get into stride. But having accelerated he becomes unstoppable. Rafa performed well in Madrid
The week before a Grand Slam tournament is one of the most difficult to analyze because the motivation of most tennis players is poor or not subject to any reasonable estimate of the ...
Such evaluation of Gasquet from the bookmakers is understandable. The Frenchman lost his two previous encounters in a row to Monaco and Nadal, which is a sign of a bad form from Richard.
davidUnsem20 Jul 00:16
I really liked entire lot that was written. I'd love to keep reading more and more. I will be happy to learn as much as I can I genuinely wonder...
XRumerTest18 Jul 08:35
Hello. And Bye.
davidUnsem17 Jul 05:04
I positively liked caboodle that was written. I'd hump to regard reading more and more. I wish be cock-a-hoop to learn as much as I can I really delight in...
davidUnsem16 Jul 21:21
I definitely liked entire lot that was written. I'd love to regard reading more and more. I liking be beneficial to learn as much as I can I actually admire...
davidUnsem16 Jul 17:28
I absolutely liked entire lot that was written. I'd bent to conserve reading more and more. I liking be beneficial to learn as much as I can I surely delight...