How sports betting works. Value betting
Sports betting is an extremely gambling activity. When you wager your hard-earned money on the outcome of the specific event and then watch it, you tend to be on edge, your adrenaline secretion is increasing, the heart beats faster and faster…And there’s only one thought pulsing in your head: will my bet win or lose? These are the typical signs of gambling excitement, emotion evoked by the prospect of success. It’s an all-consuming feeling, very hard to get rid of. As soon as you get it, you need more and more of it. It sucks you in, like drugs or alcohol.
Individuals who bet on sports very often get on this hook. They start wagering big stakes of money on random events, becoming deeply addicted to gambling. But not all sports bets are valuable enough to place them. Let me make things clear.
How do bookmakers calculate odds for the event?
Let’s assume a match Nadal - Federer. The true winning probabilities are 70% against 30%, i.e. 7 games of 10 will the Spaniard win and 3 games out of 10 will be victorious for the Swiss player. In this situation the odds are the following:
Nadal wins 1,3 Federer wins 3,0
With the consideration of the bookmaker’s margin, the original values will be modified in the following way:
Nadal wins 1,25 Federer wins 2,7
Using these figures, we calculate back in percentage and get 80% against 37%. Now the sum is 117%, the margin is 17% (117% - 100% = 17%).
This would be perfect for the bookmakers as it would make it almost impossible to win from them. They are good pros and adding to this their margin, betting could hardly be profitable. BUT…
Many punters suppose that Nadal is a very inconvenient opponent for Federer, so they bet on the Spaniard’s victory and enrich bookies with the following stakes:
Nadal wins 10 000 bucks Federer wins 2 000 bucks
Now let’s take all possible outcomes: either Nadal wins (as it happens in 2 matches out of 3), or Federer (every 3rd contest). Then the bookmaker gets the following profit or loss, depending on the outcome of the event. We also assume that for every 2 victories of Nadal there is one of Federer. The winning bets are paid off from those that lost.
Outcome Bets amount Odds Paid off amount Bookmaker’s net profit:
Nadal wins 10 000 1,25 2 500 - 500
Federer wins 2 000 2,7 3 400 6 600
At this stage we see, that should Nadal win, the bookmaker will always be out of pocket, but would gain a profit should Federer win. And it’s not a very good way to make money. Bookmakers aim to receive a consistent profit without regarding the actual outcome of the match (from any bet). So they start modifying the odds.
In our case they stimulate people to place their bets on Federer by increasing odds on the Swiss victory and decreasing them on the Spanish. And the figures we get are:
Nadal wins 1,2 Federer wins 3,2
Here we come to value. We see that the set odds differ from the true correlation of forces between the players. And our goal is to notice these deviations. The greater deviation is the larger betting value is. And don’t forget about the bookmaker’s margin.
What I’m getting at, is that not all matches are valuable. Very often punters influenced by different information wager their money considering only real winning chances of the opponents. In this case the only one who gets an edge is the bookmaker, due to his margin. Punters, in their turn, lose their bets in the run, because there is always someone who wins and who losses.
In summary, when punters rely on the relatively true distribution of odds and believe that all lines have value, totals, handicaps, winners, etc. they get it wrong. When odds reflect the true winning chances they have no value at all! But the beginners keep placing their bets and as there is always a handful of lucky dogs whose bets win, they think that there is always a value. So choose the ideal option to bet on!!!
Don’t wager on more than one sporting event a day
As a matter of fact, a valuable match is a rare thing to come across. Moreover, matches with great value are unique and it’s rather difficult to make a profit of them. Sometimes 3-5 bets are required to be in the black. So string yourself up and start looking thoroughly for potentially valuable matches. If you can’t cope with gambling excitement make it a rule not to place more than one bet on sports a day. One bet is well enough to get some extra money and to satisfy your gambling needs. In addition, you’ll try to bet on the most reliable match and that is what we need. Don’t waste your nerves and money! Follow the example of the pedestrian in the video below and avoid bookmakers’ traps!
Relevant articles:PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT OF SPORTS BETTING
Betting on tennis. Playing on outdoor hard courts
Sports Betting: a real way of making money
Betting on tennis handicaps explained
Indoor hard court tennis features. Tennis betting.
Everything in this match counts in favor of the Spaniard. Nadal, as a real locomotive, took long to get into stride. But having accelerated he becomes unstoppable. Rafa performed well in Madrid
From the moment he appeared on courts, Kei Nishikori has always been one of 5 or 6 super talented promising players. Within the last 3-4 years Kei showed nothing special which reflected on his modest results: he sustained a good tennis level, won several ATP 250 titles, performed well on majors – but...
Such evaluation of Gasquet from the bookmakers is understandable. The Frenchman lost his two previous encounters in a row to Monaco and Nadal, which is a sign of a bad form from Richard.
The week before a Grand Slam tournament is one of the most difficult to analyze because the motivation of most tennis players is poor or not subject to any reasonable estimate of the ...
Tournament yet folds up for us quite well in the market of flat bets and live bets. 6 won bets in a row perfectly enhances the mood, but we are not going to lose concentrtion and relax ...
Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray. Who will replace these guys in the near future. Today we chose tennis players who made the biggest step in his development this season. So Thiem Dominic, Batista-Agut and ...
The more I watch the matches with the American players the stronger is my feeling that they all resemble one another. It all looks like a plant cranking out products of the same quality and with the same spoilage. And this trend holds true for the last 4-5 years...
Chase Casillas09 Aug 17:52
Interpersonal coordination analysis of te
Kingsley06 Aug 09:01
Very detailed explanation on handicap betting. I have been struggling to understand what handicap is all about. However, my question is, in the example of Rafa Nadal that you used,...
Richardrew25 Jul 10:52
page30 Mar 09:33
With thanks! This is an fantastic internet site!
weblog28 Mar 04:12
Extremely informative, look frontward to coming back.